In the field of history, we are confronted with a set of historical data or events on how to deal with infectious diseases. For some reasons, these data follow a model that has led to being recognized as pandemic diseases throughout history, but the how the way of treatment and the ability to spread due to their erosive ability have not been formally acknowledged yet. Though the amount of attention paid to the treatment of this type of infectious disease has historically been the most important of all existing treatments it does not fit into today's medical models, and we see no place for it. Or basically these phenomena are not seen at all since they do not exist in our model. The current investigation seeks to answer the question with reliance to a historical approach and descriptive-analytical method, whether there is a weakness in the model in this discussion that makes these infectious diseases invisible and incurable or a weakness in the reports of eyewitnesses?
